Puzzle about Video Game Taipan

updated below – Weds 8pm

Here’s a question my brother asked: There is a video game called Taipan. It can be played as a 2-player game, where the player with the most money at the end wins. You make money by buying and selling opium in Hong Kong (you start the game with some money). The price of opium fluctuates based on some random process (which, if the player plays a bunch of times, he may be able to approximate). You have a storage facility in Hong Kong — when you feel the price is low, you buy opium and store it. When the price is high, you sell it and free up space in your storage facility (which you’ll use for future purchases).

Question: If you want to maximize your probability of winning, could there ever be a circumstance (and if so, what kind of circumstance?) where the optimal strategy involves selling a portion (greater than 0% but less than 100%) of the opium in your storage facility? Or, alternatively, should you always either sell all or none of your opium?

UPDATE: P gave a solution which looks good. Now, consider this different question:

Instead of playing it as a 2-player game, you play it as a 1-player game, and your opponent plays it as a 1-player game, separately, out of sight from you. Opium prices in your opponent’s game follow the same random process as in your game, although they are not equal to, or even correlated with, the prices in your game. In that case, assuming you want to maximize the probability of beating your friend, should you ever sell only a portion of your opium?

I am told by my brother that Taipan actually is a 1-player game, so this followup question is the more relevant one, and the one I should have asked to begin with!

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Puzzle about Video Game Taipan

  1. p says:

    Of course. Consider the situation where you have a lead with one turn left. For argument’s sake, say the price is currently $5, and it will go to either $0 or $10. Each storage facility holds 10 units.
    YOU: $50 cash, 10 units. Worth (current value) = $100.
    THEM: $50 cash, 4 units. Worth (current value) = $70.

    You have the option, on the extremes, to do nothing or to sell up to 10 units, leaving:
    YOU(nothing): $50 cash, 10 units. Worth = $100
    YOU(sell): $100 cash, 0 units. Worth = $100.

    Your opponent, on the extremes, can position himself in one of two ways, either selling 4 or buying 6:
    THEM(sell): $70 cash, 0 units. Worth = $70
    THEM(buy): $20 cash, 10 units. Worth = $70.

    Now the price changes. If it goes to $10, we have:
    YOU(nothing): Worth = $150
    YOU(sell): Worth = $100
    THEM(sell): Worth = $70
    THEM(buy): Worth = $120.

    So if you chose to sell and your opponent chose to buy, you would lose — all other combinations result in your victory. Instead, consider an interim possibility in which you sell 5 units:
    YOU(sell partial): $75 cash, 5 units. Worth = $100.

    Now, if the price goes to $10, we get:
    YOU(sell partial): Worth = $125.

    So you would win in this scenario

    If, instead, the price moved to $0, we would have:
    YOU(nothing): Worth = $50
    YOU(sell partial): Worth = $75
    YOU(sell): Worth = $100
    THEM(sell): Worth = $70
    THEM(buy): Worth = $20.

    So if you want to guarantee victory for price moves between $0 and $10 in this hypothetical, sell a partial supply.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *