You know we’re losing control of the meaning of the term “conspiracy theory”

when a National Review columnist (the guy on the right) does not object to the use of that term to describe the view that the source of Anthony Weiner’s twitter account’s controversial tweet was….. Anthony Weiner. (critical question: who would need to have “conspired” in order for that view to be correct? or does “conspiracy theory” simply mean “theory I disagree with” now? If so I will be using the former term a lot more often, as it is definitely more bothersome to the person whose theory is being critiqued.)